Read Reviews
Write Review | Product Details
IBalHZGT8
(9/6/2013)
I am keen to make a successful creaer into Supply chain management.First of all I would like to thank you for creating this blog as this opens a new avenue for inquisitive aspirants like me to communicate with successful professionals like you.Over the years my experience has covered areas including Operations Management, Supply Chain Management, Purchase, Procurement, Business Development, Market Research, Database /Knowledge Management, Compliance and Independently handling short term and medium term projects.Now I am doing Full time Post Graduation in Supply Chain Management. I want to specialize in Forecasting.Once one of my friend asked me about supply chain management, what are creaer options , Which are job profile & departments into SCM that one can look to work after completions of course, what is an average salary of professionals in SCM, which is the highest paying field into supply chain, as most of the working individuals are not aware of supply chain in india, but I think in coming year SCM industry will grow a lot. more and more companies will hire trained manpower for SCM & firms will innovate effective SCM to compete with each other.Sir, I request you to please add following things to my knowledgea) Are their any other field or job profile or departments into SCM apart from Forecasting, Retail Logistics, Shipping Logistics, Warehousing management, Inventory management and Purchase or procurement in which I can specialize? b) please enlighten me about the average salary in all the above fields (highest to Lowest in order).Sincerely,Sunil Motiramani http://ggwjdcsuwef.com [url=http://vgbahmxm.com]vgbahmxm[/url] [link=http://kkgeijvcvl.com]kkgeijvcvl[/link]
yCzN9Fwqqt
(8/29/2013)
Peter makes an excellent point about the ISO 28000<a href="http://ynkzpubel.com"> prrgoam</a> design and it’s relation to mutual recognition. We shouldn’t reinvent the wheel but we should take a look at all the supply chain security<a href="http://ynkzpubel.com"> prrgoam</a>s in the US – C-TPAT, FAST, ISO, etc. – and build a model that takes the best of all these. Peter also states that the “one size fits all” formula on supply chain security is at odds with a risk based approach sought by the industry. That is an interesting comment that we’d like to get others feedback on are you looking for a risk-based approach to supply chain security? How many of you support the idea of mutual recognition between the US C-TPAT and other AEO<a href="http://ynkzpubel.com"> prrgoam</a>s? Would it be a benefit to your organization?
LlMmu1pHaI
(8/27/2013)
I agree that mutual roitgnceion should be a no brainer.There is already an ISO International Standard for supply chain security management that is risk based. ISO 28000 was designed to facilitate the risked based management of any and all national AEO based programs.It is interesting that the Commissioner of CBP is now talking about inventing a new one for “others countries to use”.There are two international standards that make global supply chain security and mutual roitgnceion achievable, ISO 28000 as mentioned and ISO 31000 on Risk Management. Why re-invent the wheel?The problem for everyone is not so much the programs but the certification / validation schemes that confirm the conformance of these schemes of those companies and sites applying them. A self declaration based on a checklist of conformity is all but useless.The “one size fits all” formula on supply chain security is at odds with a risk based approach sought by industry. Business should be recognised and rewarded for managing the security risks applicable to their organisation and sites, thus securing their piece of the supply chain, not just for sticking up CCTV or other prescribed hardware.Conformance is not performance and the true risk based supply chain security programs must perform.There are means whereby performance based on ISO’s can be evaluated; it’s up to the regulators to recognise this and work towards the intent of the WCO Safe Framework of Standards and the international AEO guidelines. http://wdtpoqp.com [url=http://zttdis.com]zttdis[/url] [link=http://lrdopqhg.com]lrdopqhg[/link]
M1DKULfJ84
(8/27/2013)
We aboslutely agree that 1) there is more going on than ISF<a href="http://sxnxam.com"> cailpmonce</a>, and 2) that customs facilitation and trade enforcement should be a priority again. As pointed out in the bill commentary, C-TPAT certified companies should push CBP for more benefits. Until just recently, companies with a Tier 2 C-TPAT Certification weren't receiving ISF progress reports.
gLWedNANk
(8/26/2013)
![]()
The trick is this cleanse your face with HOT water (this opens up the pores and lets porcudts penetrate further). Then PAT your face with a towel, leaving your skin just a little damp. Work the porcudts in using massage motions until the product is diluted and cannot be seen. Adding the Clear Harmonized Water helps regain slip to work the product in even more. If you've done this right, there should be no residue left. Consistency is KEY! You should give a product 2+ months
EllADVIRL - Morocco